Legal Opinion

People v. Teshara

California Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1904No. Crim. No. 1013PublishedCited by 45 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County and from an order denying a new trial. W. M. Conley, Judge, presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The error assigned is, that upon the trial the court allowed the prosecution in the cross-examination of the defendant to ask questions not relating to matter testified to by him upon the examination in chief.

There was no evidence for the prosecution showing the circumstances of the homicide other than that contained in the dying declaration of the deceased, Garrett D. Loucks. He was a saloon-keeper in Santa Cruz. According to this declaration, as…

2Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. PikeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. ZerilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API