United States v. One Chevrolet Automobile
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
CLAYTON, District Judge.
The Segrest-Gentry Motor Car Company sold tbe automobile described in tbe libel to J. E. Frederick for a partial cash payment and his negotiable paper for $450 for the balance of the purchase money. In that it was stipulated that the title to the automobile was in and should remain in the vendor until the payment of all the purchase money, and with the right to retake the machine in ease of the failure to meet any future installment. This instrument was sold before maturity by the Segrest-Gentry Motor Car Company in regular course of business to the General Motors…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. MilstoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metro Taxicabs, Inc. v. Tesorero de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
- United States v. General Motors-Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. One Chevrolet CoachDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1932
- The SebastopolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- United States v. One Buick CoupeDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.