Legal Opinion
The Sebastopol
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 2, 1932No. Nos. 279, 280PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
These appeals have been argued together and may be disposed of in a single opinion, although, as will appear, somewhat different considerations are involved and have led us to different results in the two suits. The general problem presented is whether a vessel which is discovered in the illegal trans-portation of liquor within territorial waters must be proceeded against under section 26 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 *591USCA § 40) rather than for a violation of the customs or navigation laws.
The libel against the Sebastopol sought to enforce against her,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The PilotCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Lancashire Shipping Co. v. DurningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- The PatriciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933