Legal Opinion

United States v. General Motors-Acceptance Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1928No. 5222PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is a libel of information under R. S. § 3450 (26 USCA §§ 1181, 1182; Comp. St. § 6352), for the forfeiture of an automobile. The libel alleges that one Girdner used the automobile in removing, depositing, and concealing intoxicating liquor with intent to defraud the United States of the internal revenue tax thereon. The General Motors Acceptance Corporation intervened as claimant and secured possession of the automobile upon giving bond conditioned to return it on the day of the trial to abide the judgment of the court.

The automobile had been delivered to J. E.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. United States v. One Chevrolet AutomobileDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metro Taxicabs, Inc. v. Tesorero de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  2. United States v. Chevrolet Truck, Motor No. 3802777District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1929
  3. Davies Motors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. United States v. One Chevrolet CoachDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1932
  5. The SebastopolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API