Legal Opinion
United States v. One Buick Coupe
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 30, 1931No. 13PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUM, District Judge.
In this proceeding, commenced by information of libel, the United States seeks the forfeiture of one Buiek eoupé, invoking for that purpose the provisions of the customs laws, sections 3061, 3062, Rev. St. 19 USCA §§ 482, 483.
Tennant Finance Corporation intervened as claimant. The matter comes up for final hearing upon an agreed statement of facts, from which the following pertinent facts are found by the court:
On October 1, 1929, one James Provenza, while driving a Buiek eoupé over the highway bridge connecting the city of St. Augustine, Fla., with Anatasia Island, in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The PilotCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stuckert Motor Co. v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- United States v. One Hudson CoachDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
- Stuckert Motor Co. v. District Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953