Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Stansbury
California Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1952No. L. A. 21607PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of non-suit in an action for declaratory relief, an accounting, and a declaration of trust with regard to certain oil rights.
Plaintiffs argue that a nonsuit was improperly granted because there is evidence in the case which, when considered in its most favorable aspect, would sustain their case. (Estate of Arnold, 16 Cal.2d 573, 576-577 [107 P.2d 25] ; Easton v. Ash, 18 Cal.2d 530, 538 [116 P.2d 433].) However, a review of the record indicates that their claim is without merit as a judgment in their favor could not be sustained.
On March 16, 1921, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Newby v. Alto Riviera ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Loyola Marymount University v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Secrest v. SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.