Legal Opinion

Secrest v. SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-2

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 2008No. G039065PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

I

Introduction

We hold an agreement by which a lender agreed to forbear from exercising the right of foreclosure under a deed of trust securing an interest in real property comes within the statute of frauds. We also conclude the borrowers in this case failed as a matter of law to establish estoppel to assert the statute of frauds. As a result, we affirm a judgment declaring valid a notice of default and election to sell under a deed of trust.

Appellants Luther E. Secrest and Charmella C. Secrest (the Secrests) are the borrowers on a note secured by a deed of trust on their home.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W. L. Bangham, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Consolidation Services, Inc. v. Keybank National Association and KeycorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Phillip Corvello v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Chavez v. Indymac Mortgage ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API