Secrest v. SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-2
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
I
Introduction
We hold an agreement by which a lender agreed to forbear from exercising the right of foreclosure under a deed of trust securing an interest in real property comes within the statute of frauds. We also conclude the borrowers in this case failed as a matter of law to establish estoppel to assert the statute of frauds. As a result, we affirm a judgment declaring valid a notice of default and election to sell under a deed of trust.
Appellants Luther E. Secrest and Charmella C. Secrest (the Secrests) are the borrowers on a note secured by a deed of trust on their home.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W. L. Bangham, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Consolidation Services, Inc. v. Keybank National Association and KeycorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Jenkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Phillip Corvello v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Chavez v. Indymac Mortgage ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.