Legal Opinion
Loyola Marymount University v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1990No. B042722PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FUKUTO, J.
Plaintiffs, Loyola Marymount University and several present and former officers and trustees (hereafter collectively LMU), appeal from a judgment in favor of LMU’s liability insurer, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford), in an action seeking declaratory relief and damages on account of Hartford’s refusal to defend LMU in three lawsuits brought by two terminated employees. Because these lawsuits were not within the scope of Hartford’s duty to defend under its policy, the judgment will be affirmed.
Facts
The lawsuits underlying the present controversy were brought…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Insurance Co. of the West v. Haralambos Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- B & E Convalescent Center v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Frank and Freedus v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hs Services, Inc., a California Corporation v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Quan v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.