State v. Jensen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis, and from an order of said court, Dickinson, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant on December 4, 1903, was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of the offense of exercising the vocation of a peddler without having obtained a license so to do, contrary to the ordinance of the city. Thereupon the court adjudged that the defendant pay a fine of $10, and be imprisoned in the workhouse of the city until the fine was paid, not exceeding ten days. He appealed from the judgment, and also from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The ordinance, so far as here material, is in these words:
Section 1. That no person * * * shall practice or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Mankato v. FowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State ex rel. Luria v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- City of Duluth v. KruppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- City of St. Paul v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- In re WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re AmblerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State ex rel. Mudeking v. ParrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Remick v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. HartmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.