City of St. Paul v. Briggs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe municipal court of St. Paul, Hiñe, J., by which he was convicted of the offense of peddling without a license in violation of the city ordinance.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of St. Paul of peddling in violation of the ordinances of that city, and appeals from the judgment against him.
*291The facts are as follows: J. H. Martin & Co. are wholesale merchants dealing in leather and shoemakers’ supplies, and own' and conduct- a wholesale store at Minneapolis. Defendant is an employee or agent of said Martin & Co., and as such makes periodical trips from Minneapolis to St. Paul with a wagon load of such supplies, selling and disposing of the same to shoemakers and dealers in St. Paul. If any such dealers desire to purchase…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of Stamford v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Mayor of Savannah v. HusseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- State v. FettererSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- City of South Bend v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Standard Oil Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
3Cited by17 opinions
- Consumers Coal Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Cain's Coffee Co. v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State ex rel. Mudeking v. ParrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.