City of Duluth v. Krupp
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the municipal court of Duluth, refusing a new trial in a prosecution for violating the ordinance considered in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mitchell, J.1
The defendants were convicted of peddling without a license, contrary to the provisions of a city ordinance entitled “Ordinance No. 19. Peddlers, how Licensed,” passed by the city council in the assumed exercise of the power granted them by the city charter “to license and regulate all peddlers doing business within the city.” Section 1 of the ordinance forbids peddling within the city without a license. Section 2 provides for the issuing of *436licenses, and fixes the amount of the fee at $100 for a year, $60 for six months, $15 for a month, and $5 for one day. Section 3 defines the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graffty v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Mankato v. FowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State ex rel. Minnesota Railway Construction Co. v. City of HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- In re WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. v. PrinceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re AmblerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Higgins v. LacroixSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Willis v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- State Ex Rel. Remick v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. Modern Box Makers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.