Legal Opinion
State v. Hartmann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 28, 2005No. A03-1674PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Appellants Diane and Michael Hart-mann appeal their convictions of failure to obtain a license to sell meat under Minn. Stat. § 28A.04 (2004) and unauthorized sale of custom-processed meat under MinmStat. § 31A.10(4) (2004).1 Before the district court and the court of appeals, the Hartmanns argued that their conduct was statutorily exempt from prosecution and also protected by Article XIII, Section 7, of the Minnesota Constitution. Both lower courts concluded that the Hartmanns’ conduct was neither statutorily nor constitutionally exempt from prosecution. We affirm in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. HugginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Gardner v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. PettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. VueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. HeigesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Goodman v. Best Buy, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.