Poor v. Hill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
At the outset, we observe that the appeals of both plaintiffs and defendants are subject to dismissal, see Northwood Homeowners Assn. v. Town of Chapel Hill, 112 N.C. App. 630, 632, 436 S.E.2d 282, 283 (1993), in that the parties’ appellate briefs violate the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure (the Rules) by failing to support their respective summary of the facts with sufficient “references to pages in the transcript of proceedings, the record on appeal, or exhibits,” N.C.R. App. P. 28(b)(4). Notwithstanding, in view of the errors identified herein, we elect in our…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by338 opinions
- Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Carcano v. JBSS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- McLamb v. T.P., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Schlieper v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.