Legal Opinion

Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1991No. 271A89PublishedCited by 200 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This is an action seeking compensatory, punitive and treble damages for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of corporate bylaws, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce (unfair practices) based on defendants’ allegedly improper refusal to redeem a certain “revolving fund certificate” issued by the corporate defendant (Raeford) to plaintiff. The trial court dismissed the claim for unfair practices under Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.1 The other claims were tried before a jury,2 which returned a verdict granting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Pearce v. American Defender Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by200 opinions

  1. Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  3. Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Lyons Partnership, L.P., a Texas Limited Partnership v. Morris Costumes, Incorporated Philip Morris Amy Morris SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API