Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Hechtman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendants Hechtman and Josephine Bowers from a judgment of the district court for Bamsey county, Kelly, J., presiding, setting aside a mortgage foreclosure by advertisement and allowing plaintiff to redeem.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The plaintiff executed to the J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Company, a 'Wisconsin corporation, a real-estate mortgage, •containing a power of sale, to secure the payment of $1,720, and interest, payable according to the conditions of three promissory notes, to wit: One for $400, due October 15, 1884; one for $420, due December 1, 1884; and one for $900, due December 1, 1885. The mortgage was assigned by the threshing-machine company to one WM. Nye, who proceeded to foreclose it under the power. The notice, of sale stated the amount claimed to be then due to be $1,855. The first publication of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Lovett v. Steam Saw Mill Ass'nNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  3. City of Faribault v. MisenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  4. Groff v. RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  5. Jencks v. AlexanderNew York Court of Chancery · 1845

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lloyd v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. Bennett v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Ellison v. BranstratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Martin v. YagerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API