Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Knowles

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1896No. Nos. 10,094-(285)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tlie municipal court of Minneapolis, Holt, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStajrt, C. J.

The plaintiff, claiming to he the assignee of the New Columbian Athletic Club, a corporation, by virtue of an assignment alleged to have been made by it to him for the benefit of its creditors under the insolvency laws of the state, brought this action to recover from the defendant the value of certain personal property of the corporation, which he had, as a constable, levied on by virtue of an execution against it. The making of the assignment was put in issue by the answer. The trial court found that no assignment was made by the corporation, and ordered judgment for the defendant, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wells v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. BrackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. DeGraw v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Ferris v. BoxellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Simon v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Erickson v. SammonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. In Re Order of Sammons, Co. Superintendent of SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Barnard v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Brown v. ReinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. First National Bank of Casselton v. Casselton Realty & Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API