Legal Opinion

City of Faribault v. Misener

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1874PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Rice county. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Young, J.

The charter of the plaintiff, the *397city of Faribault, provides that “ it shall be lawful for the common council of said city at any time to levy a corporation poll-tax upon every qualified voter in said city; provided, that said tax shall not, in any one year, exceed the sum- of two dollars on each person.”

“ The common council shall have power * * * to authorize the formation of fire engine, hook and ladder, and hose companies * * *. Every member of each company which may be authorized to be formed, shall be exempt from highway work and poll-tax, from serving on juries…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Lane County v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  4. Andover & Medford Turnpike Corp. v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Cole v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Breedlove v. SuttlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Allen v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  4. Crabtree v. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  5. Ames v. Lake Superior & Mississippi RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API