Groff v. Ramsey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was brought in the court of common pleas of Ramsey county, and was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was ordered for the defendant Ramsey, (who alone answered the complaint,) for the affirmative relief asked by him in his answer. The plaintiff appeals, from an order refusing a new trial. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
McMillan, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiffs for the partition of certain real estate or a sale thereof if partition cannot be made, &c. The premises which are alleged to be subject to partition or sale are the east half of lot ten in block twenty-six, St. Paul proper, being twenty-five feet front on Third street by one hundred and fifty feet deep, the value of which is alleged to be $ 12,500.
*47The complaint alleges title in the plaintiff, Matthew Groff, in fee, in and to the undivided two-thirds of the premises, and admits title to the remaining undivided one-third…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Morrison v. KellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
- Bidwell v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Metropolitan Bank v. GodfreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Morrison v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Beekman v. Sonntag Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Forsee v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
- New v. WheatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Palmer v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.