Legal Opinion

Callaway v. Nu-Cor Automotive Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 2006No. 05AP-1015PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bryant, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellants, Charles Callaway (“plaintiff’) and Jean Callaway (“Callaway”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Nu-Cor Automotive Corporation (“Nu-Cor”). Because plaintiffs intentional-tort claim and Callaway’s claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress are barred by the statute of limitations, and because Nu-Cor is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Callaway’s claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, we affirm.

{¶…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Winkle v. Zettler Funeral Homes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Creech v. GabaOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Stafford v. Clever Investigations, 06ap-1204 (9-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Potter v. CottrillOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. White v. StottsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API