Intermountain Lloyds v. Diefendorf
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McNAUGHTON J.
Intermountain Lloyds, an association of underwriters doing business as a fire insurance company in Utah, seeks a certificate of authority to engage in the business of writing fire insurance in this state. The Commissioner of Finance and Director of Insurance have refused to consider the application on the ground that the plan or set-up of this association does not afford such a business entity as may lawfully do a fire insurance business in this state. Thereupon this action for a writ of mandate was begun to compel the defendant officers to consider the application.
In the lower…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- National Union Fire Insurance v. WanbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Commonwealth v. VroomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- State Ex Rel. National Mutual Ins. v. ConnOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Intermountain Lloyds v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- CDA Dairy Queen, Inc. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. MacDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- United States ex rel. Midwest Steel & Iron Works Co. v. HenlyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1954
- Hosmer v. Mutual Reserve InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.