Legal Opinion

Hosmer v. Mutual Reserve Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1934No. 31,609PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for money advanced to a mutual fire insurance company to enable it to pay promptly a fire loss. The only question presented on this appeal is whether the judgment should have been restricted to be paid out of its surplus only. The trial court found the facts as follows:

“That the defendant is a mutual insurance company incorporated and existing under and by virtue of article 12 of the insurance code of the state of Kansas; that from March, 1930, to April, 1931, the plaintiff, A. E. Hosmer, was qualified and acting president…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Coleman v. Wichita Mutual Burial Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Kennedy v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. State v. Vigilant InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Endowment & Benevolent Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hosmer v. Mutual Reserve InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API