Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Intermountain Lloyds v. Porter

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1930No. 6,722PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Relators commenced this action in mandamus to compel respondent to issue to Intermountain Lloyds a license to carry on the business of insurance as described in subdivision 1, section 6111, Revised. Codes 1921. An alternative writ was issued. Respondent filed a motion to quash the alternative writ upon the ground that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to warrant the relief asked. By agreement, the merits of the case depended upon the sufficiency of the facts set forth in the petition, and the case was submitted for final' decision on the motion to quash. The district court granted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spratt v. Helena Power Transmission Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bailey, Collector v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sanders CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Great American Home Savings Institution v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  5. State ex rel. Hoadley v. Board of Insurance CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Twin Falls Canal Co. v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Griffin v. GreeneMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McMahon v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Young v. Board of TrusteesMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Pierson v. HendricksenMontana Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API