Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Midwest Steel & Iron Works Co. v. Henly

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided January 4, 1954No. 2967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, District Judge.

This action is brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant Henly and the Western Casualty and Surety Company under and by virtue of the authority conferred in an Act of Congress, August 24, 1935, c. 642, 49 Stat. 793, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq., commonly known as the Miller Act, relating to the furnishing of bonds by a contractor with the United States for public work. It is alleged that the plaintiff, The Midwest Steel and Iron Works Company, furnished, sold and delivered to the defendant company, a partnership, goods, wares and merchandise required in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Osborn v. OzlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. League v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Henley v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Waggoner v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Western Steel Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. CDA Dairy Queen, Inc. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. United States Ex Rel. Western Steel Union Co. v. Reliance Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1964
  5. Chaney v. Western States Title Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API