State Ex Rel. National Mutual Ins. v. Conn
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
An examination of each and all of the twenty-three paragraphs sought to be stricken from the answers and cross-petitions shows that they are all of the same nature, and, if any of them are relevant, all are relevant. Summarizing a portion of the allegations sought to be stricken out, they amount to a claim that the contract between Mr. Brookhart and the companies, and the modification thereof, and the payments' to Mr. Brookhart under the contract, are illegal, as they constitute a violation not only of the general corporation laws of the state, but particularly violate certain portions of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. BowenOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Commissioner of Insurance v. American Life Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Intermountain Lloyds v. DiefendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Golden Christian Academy v. ZelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.