Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. National Mutual Ins. v. Conn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1927No. 19828 and 19829PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

An examination of each and all of the twenty-three paragraphs sought to be stricken from the answers and cross-petitions shows that they are all of the same nature, and, if any of them are relevant, all are relevant. Summarizing a portion of the allegations sought to be stricken out, they amount to a claim that the contract between Mr. Brookhart and the companies, and the modification thereof, and the payments' to Mr. Brookhart under the contract, are illegal, as they constitute a violation not only of the general corporation laws of the state, but particularly violate certain portions of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. BowenOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Commissioner of Insurance v. American Life Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Intermountain Lloyds v. DiefendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Golden Christian Academy v. ZelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API