Legal Opinion

City of Wilson v. Batten Family, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 2013No. COA12-1103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

The City of Wilson (Plaintiff), pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 136 of the North Carolina General Statutes, filed a complaint on 30 June 2008, to acquire by condemnation a portion of real property owned by The Batten Family, L.L.C. (Defendant) in order to obtain a utility easement.1 Plaintiff sought a permanent easement of right-of-way to “construct, *435install, operate, utilize, inspect, rebuild, repair, replace, remove, and maintain overhead and/or underground facilities consisting of electric, gas or other fuel products, communication, or other utilities within [the] easement…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Eways v. Governor's IslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Apex v. RubinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Adver. of Charlotte Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Town of Nags Head v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Dep't of Transp. v. Bloomsbury Ests., LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
  5. Town of Nags Head v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API