Legal Opinion

Town of Nags Head v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 2018No. COA17-498PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INMAN, Judge.

*326This appeal, following a jury verdict for property owners and entry of judgment notwithstanding *878the verdict ("JNOV"), presents an issue of first impression: whether a municipality that takes an easement in privately owned oceanfront property to replenish the beach can avoid compensating the private property owner by asserting public trust rights vested in the State. On the record before us, we hold that the property owner is entitled to compensation as provided by the eminent domain statute.

We also hold that the jury's verdict was supported by a scintilla of evidence and reverse…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coastal Conservation Ass'n v. State of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  2. Coastal Conservation Ass'n v. State of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API