City of Hobart v. Chidester
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON CIVIL PETITION TO TRANSFER
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This appeal presents questions about what evidence a trial court may consider in proceedings contesting municipal annexations. It has been about twenty years since this Court last spoke on the subject.1 During these decades, both the statutes and case law in this area have continued to evolve. We grant transfer to address certain issues of statutory interpretation which have developed since our last visit.
I Case History
This case arose after the City of Hobart adopted ordinances to annex certain adjacent and contiguous portions of Ross…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- KING v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Sharp v. City of MishawakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Bradley v. City of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Rogers v. Municipal City of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Carmel v. Certain Southwest Clay Township Annexation Territory LandownersIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Annexation Ordinance F-2008-15 v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.