Legal Opinion
KING v. City of Bloomington
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1959No. 29,746PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
This appeal is the result of a remonstrance filed against the annexation of certain territory by the City of Bloomington, Indiana under Burns’ §48-702, Acts 1955, ch. 269, sec. 3, p. 720.
We are first concerned here with a motion to dismiss the appeal by the appellee, City of Bloomington, under Rule 2-6 of this court, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:
“In the title to the assignment of errors all parties to the judgment seeking relief by the appeal shall be named as appellants, and all parties to the judgment whose interests are adverse to the interests of the appellants shall be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Baugher v. Hall, Receiver, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Thomas v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Bradley v. City of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Hobart v. ChidesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Dennis E. Walters and Betty L. Walters, D/B/A Denny's Food Mart, Plaintiffs v. Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Rogers v. Municipal City of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.