Legal Opinion

Horace Mann Insurance v. Leeber

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1988No. CC985PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Chief Justice:

This case presents two related questions of first impression in this jurisdiction, specifically, whether a homeowner’s or other liability insurer has a duty to (1) defend and to (2) pay on behalf of its insured when an action has been brought against the insured based upon alleged sexual misconduct and when the insurance policy has an exclusion from coverage for “liability ... caused intentionally by ... the insured.” The Circuit Court of Raleigh County (the “trial court”) answered these questions in the negative and certified the questions to us. 1 We agree with the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PitroloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Terrio v. McDONOUGH HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Findley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. West Virginia Fire & Casualty Co. v. StanleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API