Legal Opinion

Ayar v. Foodland Distributors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2005No. Docket 126870PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue in this case is when interest begins to accrue, pursuant to MCL 600.6013(8), on costs and attorney fees imposed for rejecting a mediation evaluation, MCR 2.403(O)(l), (6).1 The clear language of this statute indicates that it accrues from the date of the filing of the complaint. The Court of Appeals, in reversing the order of the trial court, incorrectly concluded that accrual did not begin on that date. This was error, and accordingly, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals2 and reinstate the order of the circuit court.

*715i

In October 1993…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Morales v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Ayar v. Foodland DistributorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Washington v. Sinai Hosp. of Greater DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Chelsea Investment Group LLC v. City of ChelseaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API