Legal Opinion

Ayar v. Foodland Distributors

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2004No. Docket 246349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Kroger Company (Kroger) appeals by delayed leave granted the trial court’s November 14, 2002, postjudgment order awarding plaintiffs, Raad Ayar (Ayar) and Vincent, Inc. (Vincent), statutory interest pursuant to MCL 600.6013 on an earlier June 24, 2002, order awarding costs and mediation sanctions. We reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiffs, Ayar, Vincent, Joliet, Inc., and R & D Wholesale, Inc., filed a complaint alleging various contract and tort claims against Kroger and Foodland Distributors (Foodland) on October 7, 1993. Livonia Holding Company, Inc. (Livonia), was later…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Beach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ayar v. Foodland DistributorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ayar v. Foodland DistributorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API