Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This case presents the question whether a complaint alleging medical malpractice that is filed before the expiration of the notice period provided by MCL 600.2912b tolls the period of limitations. The Court of Appeals held that a prematurely filed complaint invokes the tolling provisions of MCL 600.5856(a). We disagree. MCL 600.2912b(l) unambiguously states that a person “shall not” commence an action alleging medical malpractice until the expiration of the statutory notice period. A complaint filed before the expiration of the notice period violates MCL 600.2912b and is ineffective to toll…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- People v. FranciscoMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Costa v. Community Emergency Medical Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Ayar v. Foodland DistributorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.