Legal Opinion

Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2005No. Docket 124928PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question whether a complaint alleging medical malpractice that is filed before the expiration of the notice period provided by MCL 600.2912b tolls the period of limitations. The Court of Appeals held that a prematurely filed complaint invokes the tolling provisions of MCL 600.5856(a). We disagree. MCL 600.2912b(l) unambiguously states that a person “shall not” commence an action alleging medical malpractice until the expiration of the statutory notice period. A complaint filed before the expiration of the notice period violates MCL 600.2912b and is ineffective to toll…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. People v. FranciscoMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Costa v. Community Emergency Medical Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Ayar v. Foodland DistributorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API