Legal Opinion

Morales v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2003No. Docket 122601PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

2Per curiam

At issue in this case is whether prejudgment interest awarded under MCL 600.6013 accrues during appellate proceedings. On the authority of Dedes v Asch, 1 the Court of Appeals held that it does not. 2 We disagree because the language of MCL 600.6013 unambiguously states that prejudgment interest is to be calculated from the date the complaint is filed. It contains no exception for periods of appellate delay. Accordingly, we overrule the 1998 Court of Appeals decision in Dedes. We also reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case and remand it to the trial…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kenneth Henes Special Projects Procurement, Marketing & Consulting Corp. v. Continental Biomass Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Morales v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Helder v. SrubaMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Neal v. WilkesMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Department of Agriculture v. Appletree Marketing, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API