Huygen v. Plums Enterprises of St. Paul, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal involves nine discrimination claims against Plums Enterprises of St. Paul, Inc., d.b.a. Plums, a bar and restaurant in St. Paul. The complainants are 19 and 20 year olds who were denied admission to Plums because of the bar’s policy prohibiting admission of anyone under 21 years of age after 9:00 p.m., unless accompanied by a parent or guardian.
Plums admitted the policy violated St. Paul’s anti-discrimination ordinance, St. Paul, Minn. Legislative Code § 183.08 (1983), prior to the hearing before the City’s Human Rights Commission (Commission). Plums…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Minneapolis v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Benson Cooperative Creamery Ass'n v. First District Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Wajda v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Willeck v. WilleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McAllister v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Minneapolis Police Department v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Minneapolis Police Department v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010