Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 2010No. A09-81Published

1Opinion of the Court

776 N.W.2d 760 (2010)

MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Relator,

v.

Phillip KELLY, Respondent,

City of Minneapolis, Commission on Civil Rights, Respondent.

No. A09-81.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 12, 2010.

Susan L. Segal, Minneapolis City Attorney, Timothy S. Skarda, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for relator.

William L. Walker, Walker Law Offices, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent, Kelly.

Considered and decided by MINGE, Presiding Judge; SCHELLHAS, Judge; and HARTEN, Judge.

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

By writ of certiorari, relator Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) seeks reversal of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API