Hubbs v. Costello
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Presiding Judge.
The basic question raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred when he granted the defendants’ motions for directed verdicts, thereby denying plaintiffs any relief on their complaint.' Subsidiary to the basic question are issues relating to election of remedies, the legal requirements for proving a claim for relief based upon innocent or negligent misrepresentations, and the sufficiency of the evidence in support of such a claim. 1
The background facts involve a sale by the plaintiffs-appellants of certain apartments situated in Phoenix, Arizona in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Davis v. WeberArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Lehnhardt v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Haynie v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Maxwell v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Gibson v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Rodriguez v. Besser Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.