Legal Opinion

Lehnhardt v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1969No. 9654PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff below quit-claimed part of her property to the city of Phoenix for roadway purposes. She sought rescission of the transaction and cancellation of the quitclaim deed, alleging misrepresentation by-the city. From a judgment denying rescission she brings this appeal.

The trial court made findings of - fact and ' stated separately its conclusions of law. Plaintiff contends on appeal ‘that she is entitled to judgment on the. facts found by the court below. Those- facts-found by the trial court which wé deem pertinent to the appeal are as follows:

On January 31, 1959,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Miller v. BoegerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Watkins v. Grady County Soil & Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Berry v. RobotkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. O'Malley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Halpert v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. Mayer v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API