Lehnhardt v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff below quit-claimed part of her property to the city of Phoenix for roadway purposes. She sought rescission of the transaction and cancellation of the quitclaim deed, alleging misrepresentation by-the city. From a judgment denying rescission she brings this appeal.
The trial court made findings of - fact and ' stated separately its conclusions of law. Plaintiff contends on appeal ‘that she is entitled to judgment on the. facts found by the court below. Those- facts-found by the trial court which wé deem pertinent to the appeal are as follows:
On January 31, 1959,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Miller v. BoegerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Watkins v. Grady County Soil & Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Berry v. RobotkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. O'Malley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Halpert v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- Mayer v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.