Legal Opinion

Haynie v. Taylor

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1950No. 5084PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

In the year 1939 Dan H. Taylor and Ralph Schupbach, hereinafter called by their surnames, were ¡the owners as tenants in common of Chance Claims Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Swisshelm mining district, Cochise County, Arizona. Ether Haynie, one of the plaintiffs herein, who will hereinafter be called Haynie, was the lessee of the Scribner group of mining claims adjoining the Chance Claims on the west. There were no usable shafts on the Scribner Claims but there were two shafts on the Chance Claims known as the old or lower shaft and the new or upper shaft in sufficient proximity…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rundle v. WintersArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Light v. Chandler Improvement Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Stewart v. SchnepfArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. McClureArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Greer v. GoeslingArizona Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Mayo v. EphromArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Owens v. M.E. Schepp Ltd. PartnershipArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lane v. MathewsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hammontree v. KenworthyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API