Legal Opinion
Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life Insurance
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1981No. 15028PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
This appeal stems from an action for breach of contract brought in the Pima County Superior Court. Trial was held to the court and findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered. Taking jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S., Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, rule 19(e), we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
At the outset we note that unless clearly erroneous, findings of fact will not be disturbed on appeal. United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co., 121 Ariz. 438, 590 P.2d 1384 (1979); 16 A.R.S., Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52(a). Since we feel the record supports the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
- United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Standage Ventures, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- A & a Sign Company, Inc. v. Rex E. Maughan, Trustee of Mayer Central Building Corporation, a DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1983
- Estate of Nelson v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. DanielsArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.