Legal Opinion

Steele v. Vanderslice

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1961No. 6725PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS F. JONES, Superior Court Judge.

Plaintiffs, appellees herein, brought an action against defendants, appellants herein, on a promissory note secured by a mortgage on Pinal County real estate in the principal sum of $8,500. The note also provided for interest and reasonable attorneys’ fees. Defendants’ Answer admits the execution of the note and a mortgage in the principal sum of $8,500, and admits that they have paid no sums on the note; and allege tender of payment to plaintiffs. Defendants further allege that checks were substituted for the note, and therefore plaintiffs are not entitled…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lutfy v. R. D. Roper & Sons Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Home Trust Co. v. JosephsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Leigh v. SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1952

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. United States v. Joseph ForcellatiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. Elson Development Co. v. Arizona Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Adelman v. ChristyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API