Legal Opinion

Golden v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 6, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00710PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se; Sua Sponte Dismissal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(h)(3); Transfer Not in the Interest of Justice under 28 U.S.C. § 1631

OPINION AND ORDER

CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge

Plaintiff, La Quetta Maria Golden (Ms. Golden or plaintiff), brings claims against the United States, challenging the actions of an employee in the Admissions Office of the Supreme Court of the United States. Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel. 1

Following Ms. Golden’s voluntary resignation from the Mississippi State Bar, she became ineligible to be a member of, and was subsequently disbarred from,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Alston-Bullock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Refaei v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Hicks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API