Legal Opinion
Alston-Bullock v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 22, 2015No. 15-570CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; In Forma Pauperis Application; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
ORDER
MARIAN BLANK HORN, Judge
On June 4, 2015, plaintiff Dallas Matthew Alston-Bullock filed a one and one-third page, handwritten pro se letter in the United States Court of Federal Claims, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis, to which he attached a trust fund account statement from the North Carolina Department of Public Safety.
The full complaint reads as follows:1
*401) 1 Dallas Bullock claim and demand a Judgment, against the United States. In an amount of $ 400,000 for an unjust conviction…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mendiola v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Adair v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Begay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Conerly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.