Hicks v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se; 26 USC § 6402; Tax; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction.
OPINION
HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
In the above-captioned ease, pro se plaintiff Will Hicks, Jr. seeks to recover federal income tax refuiids for the past two years that he alleges were illegally withheld by the defendant, acting through the United States Department of Treasury, “to pay back a state debt.” 1 Plaintiffs complaint contains very few factual allegations. Plaintiff alleges that his individual income tax refund “has been garnished illegally for the past two years” and that he has made requests, “on numerous occasions,” to…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cahoo v. Sas Inst. Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Nelson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Nelson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Stone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019