Legal Opinion
Hemisphere Oil & Gas Co. v. Oil Well Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1924No. 13744PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAX, C.
The various assignments of error are presented under four general heads, as follows:.(1) The trial court erred in. admitting evidence on the part of the defendant in error, Oil Well Supply Company.(2) The defendant in error Oil Well Supply Company should not have been permitted to amend its lien statement to include the property of the Hemisphere Oil & Gas Company.(3) The trial court should have found that the Hemisphere Oil & Gas Company was an innocent purchaser.(4) The judgment is not sustained by the evidence, and is contrary to law'.
It is contended that a proper…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Collinsville Nat. Bank v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Skirvin Operating Co. v. Southwestern Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Navarre Et Ux. v. HoneaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Schaap v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- K & H Well Service, Inc. v. Tcina, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Clover v. NeelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Jones v. Sinclair Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Katnig v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Sooner Pipe & Supply Corporation v. RehmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.