Legal Opinion
K & H Well Service, Inc. v. Tcina, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 2, 2002No. 93,451PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 Today’s cause requires review of the process employed by K & H Well Service, Inc. [lien claimant or K & H] to secure a money judgment against named leasehold owners, to establish the validity of its 42 O.S.1991 § 144 1 oil and gas well liens, and to foreclose the same.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 K & H provided materials, supplies and well services in the reworking and drilling of several oil and gas wells in Seminole and Pottawatomie counties during a period beginning in July 1998 and ending in November 1998. K & H alleges that it was hired to perform this work by Tcina, Inc., the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Dismuke v. CsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Scott v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- STATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Coen v. Semgroup Energy Partners G.P., LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- MEEKS v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.