Navarre Et Ux. v. Honea
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; Sam Hooker,, Judge. Action by John W. Honea and Travis Williams against Louis M. Navarre and Julia Navarre, on account. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
Plaintiffs in error (who are husband and wife) will be designated as defendants, and defendants in error (who are copartners) will be designated as plaintiffs, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
Plaintiffs sued and, upon the verdict of a jury, recovered judgment in a justice’s court for $151.87, as a balance on account, and, upon trial de novo in the county court on appeal, again recovered judgment, upon the verdict of a jury, but only for the sum of $105. Defendants denied some of the items charged against them in the account, and alleged payment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Donovan v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- F. Dohmen Co. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. KeyesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Dakota · 1898
- Paine v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sharp v. Pawhuska Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Clover v. NeelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Hemisphere Oil & Gas Co. v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Maney v. CherrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State v. BrassfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.