Katnig v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
This action was commenced by plaintiff in error, Katnig, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, to recover from defendant in error, Johnson, hereinafter referred to as defendant, the sum of $1354.83 alleged by plaintiff to be defendant’s proportionate part of the expenses necessary to develop and operate a certain oil and gas lease. Defendant in error, Mohawk Petroleum Company, purchases the oil produced by the lease here in question.
The jury’s verdict denied plaintiff any recovery, and he appeals on the original record from an order overruling his motion for a new trial.
In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Superior Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Gillespie v. ShufflinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Wammack v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- McAnally v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- King-Stevenson Gas & Oil Co. v. Texam Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Jolley v. ClayIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Hill v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Lyman Grazing Association v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.