Legal Opinion

Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. Clark Bros. Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 10, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity for alleged infringement of the reissue patent, No. 13,991, of October 12,1915, granted to Robert Meyer, and patent No. 1,-341,145 of May 25,1920, to the same inventor as assignor, both patents relating to plate valves which are utilized in machinery for compressed air and gases. Compressors of this type are largely used in manufacturing plants for driving machinery of various sizes; also for driving natural gas through pipes, supplying air to blast furnaces, and, in small sizes, they are used for inflating automobile tires, or drilling or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Magowan v. New York Belting & Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Baldwin v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  4. Auto Hone Co. v. Hall Cylinder Hone Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1924
  5. Schenck v. Singer Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montmarquet v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
  2. Stanley Works v. C. S. Mersick Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API