Legal Opinion

Stanley Works v. C. S. Mersick Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 6, 1940No. 2707PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

This is an infringement suit raising issues of validity and infringement.

Findings of Fact

1. Plaintiff herein, The Stanley Works, is a corporation of Connecticut, and the plaintiff, Andre Gueneau, is a citizen of France residing in Paris, France.

2. Defendant herein, The C. S. Mersick & Company, is a corporation of Connecticut having a place of business in New Haven, Connecticut, where it has sold a certain sheet metal cutting tool charged to infringe the patents in suit, these tools having been manufactured by the Black & Decker Manufacturing Company, a Maryland…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. National Nut Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. American Automotoneer Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. Otis Elevator Co. v. Atlantic Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  2. Monogram Mfg. Co. v. Glemby Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Schenk v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1941
  4. Rothholz v. KregerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API