Legal Opinion

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 1917No. 67PublishedCited by 42 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

Suit for infringement of a patent embraced in letters patent No. 821,580 and a re-issue thereof, No. 13,542.

The suit was originally brought by Frederick E. Baldwin, patentee. John Simmons Company, licensee, having the exclusive right to manufacture and sell the patented device, subsequently intervened and became complainant.

The patents are for a lamp designed to generate and burn acetylene or similar gas “intended for use,”'to quote the description of the.patents, “and adapted to use as a bicycle, automobile, yacht, or miner’s lamp, or for any other analogous purpose, it being necessary only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  5. Slimfold Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Kinkead Industries, Inc. And United States Gypsum Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API